Page 10 - PR3_Case study_Final version _English

oversight company:
● Capgemini employees have the choice of working between 30% in
the office and 70% at home. It's not 50-50 like some companies or
75-25.
● The employee chooses and decides on this ratio himself, provided
that he is present at the office at least 30% of the time.
● There must be some coordination with the manager and the team
but the success factor is solely based on results. This is a hybrid
operation based on work results.

CapGemini has been able to develop a working model based on trust in
others. Trust is one of the values placed at the center of its management.
Capgemini has opted for this type of innovative hybrid system allowing
the employee to decide for himself his balance of work remotely. The fact
Outcomes
that the manager has no say in this scheme is a practice very little present
in companies. The ability to work up to 70% from home is also quite
unique.

CASE STUDY N°2

Name of the KPMG LLP - World
company/Thematic www.us.kpmg.com8
Profile KPMG LLP, an audit, tax and advisory firm, is the U.S. member firm of
KPMG International, with headquarters in New York. KPMG
International’s member firms have nearly 100,000 professionals,
including 6,800 partners, in 148 countries.
Challenge Employee retention & desire to be an employer of choice
Solution Job Sharing, Flextime, Compressed work weeks, Telecommuting

• All of the company’s flexibility programs, including job-sharing, are
Policy parameters available to all employees
throughout KPMG.
• Requests for flexibility are primarily generated by the employees
themselves. For job sharing, the
process typically begins when an employee who wants to work a
reduced schedule and knows of someone else in a similar situation with
compatible desires and skills requests a job sharing
arrangement.
• An employee fills out a request form and submits it to his or her
manager, who is trained to approach
such requests with a “how can we make this work” attitude.

Development & • Job sharing was initially undertaken at KPMG in response to a specific
oversight need – two individuals wanted
to reduce their hours and it worked for that specific job.